IN PRAISE OF MINOR WRITERS.
I've long been a fan of the Dictionary of Literary Biography series (Wikipedia, publisher's site), now up to Volume 366 (Orientalist Writers), but I've had to consult them in libraries, since the damn things cost over $300 each. New, that is; a while back it occurred to me to add the ones for Russian writers to my private Amazon wishlist, and sure enough, they occasionally show up used for only a few bucks. So far I've accumulated volumes 198 (Russian literature in the age of Pushkin and Gogol: Prose), 238 (Russian novelists in the age of Tolstoy and Dostoevsky), 272 (Russian prose writers between the world wars), and the most recently acquired, Early Modern Russian Writers
Vasilii Grigor'evich Ruban was an enterprising and prolific participant in eighteenth-century Russia's equivalent of Grub Street?a host of professional literary men willing and able to undertake any writing task, equally adept at producing manuals on agriculture or card playing, at composing panegyric odes to the high and mighty or Russifying the works of Homer or Horace, and at performing as compilers, editors, and publishers. Such hackwork was by no means necessarily of poor quality; reputable writers were produced in this way. In Ruban's case there were works compiled, edited, published, and also translated by him that received wide approval and appreciation. However, Ruban was notorious among his contemporaries for producing great quantities of occasional poems, especially those written for or to patrons whose protection, gifts, and monetary support he solicited and often gained. Ruban's more distinguished and independent fellow writers reviled and mocked these "obsequious" verses, and he was subsequently condemned as a sycophant[...] Although that reputation has survived into the twentieth century, an unbiased assessment, without denying his reprehensible traits, must also acknowledge Ruban not only as a literary entrepreneur of extraordinary energy and versatility (not to speak of productivity) but also a competent writer typical of eighteenth-century Russia and of interest in his own right, especially as a poet.One of the sad aspects of literary history is the tendency of writers blessed with a good position in society, from Pushkin to Virginia Woolf, to sneer at the lowly scribblers who are unable to match their leisurely grace.
Some other tidbits from this volume: of the religious figure Gedeon (Russian Wikipedia), "the first to preach in Russian rather than Church Slavonic," Victor Zhikov writes:
Having become a grandee in his way, Gedeon also adopted the accepted cultural codes dictating how a magnate should act. One element of such behavior at mid century was apparently petty tyranny, and anecdotes about Gedeon ascribe such behavior to him. For example, it is said that while walking through the Trinity?Saint Sergius Monastery with his prot?g? Platon Levshin (the future metropolitan of Moscow; at the time a simple priest), Gedeon noticed the valuable silk cassock Platon was wearing and pushed him into a pond. Afterwards he reportedly made an admonition that someone of a lower rank should not be upset when a superior jokes with him and thereupon presented Platon with two expensive cassocks to replace the one that had been ruined.Antiokh Kantemir had problems as a young man because his father "named as his heir whichever son excelled the most in his studies by the time of his coming of age," at the same time calling Antiokh, the youngest, "the best of all in intelligence and learning"; as you might imagine, "the indefiniteness of the will regarding the inheritance later resulted in lengthy family disputes." And it was fascinating to read David Gasperetti's article on Matvei Komarov (Russian Wikipedia), forgotten now but in his day "Russia's first best-selling literary figure," whose 1779 Van'ka Kain "reached more readers than almost any other Russian novel, with a publication history spanning close to one hundred years," and whose Milord George was even more successful: "Belinsky went so far as to call the novel immortal, and [...] Leo Tolstoy observed that the people were far more interested in Milord George than in the belles lettres and philosophy that the leading lights of Russian culture would have them read. Komarov's tale of the English lord remained a best-seller in Russia until the newly established Bolshevik state did what the cajoling of previous generations of critics never could: it confiscated an edition of the work that was at press in 1918, thus ending its remarkable 136-year publication history." Posted by languagehat at February 28, 2013 04:06 PM
Belinsky, apparently, was totally in the dark about the author of the "Milord", asking himself who was this lucky author of immortal fate, when did he live, if he was for real at all:
?????? ???? ??? ?? ??????? ? ???????????, ??? ?????? ?????. ?? ?????? ????? ???? ????? "??????????? ???????", ?? ???? ?? ???? ??? ? ?????? ??? ?????: ?? ??? ?? ??? ??????, ? ?? ?? ??? ??? ?????????? ? ????????? ??? ????? ???? ??????! ???? ???? ?? ????, ??????? ????? ??? ????? ?? ???: ?????? ??? ?? ????? ????, ?? ????? ?????. ??????? ?????! ??????? ????????? ? ?????? ?????? ???? ??????, ???? ??????? ??????????? ? "??????????? ???????". ???? ?? ??? ????? ????? ?????? ? -- ????????????? -- ??????? ??? ???, ? ?????? ? ?????? ??? ?????? ??? ???? ?? ??????????!
The book has been reprinted again in 2000
I find that in some ways reading about minor writers is more interesting and revealing than reading about major ones. You read about [famous writers] to understand [them], but you read about [less well-known ones] to understand their times.
This is also my attitude in general.
I think this is also true of other forms of art: the great musicians, painters, etc transcend their times, the minor ones reveal them. You need to know some of the minor ones to realize what a difference the major ones made.
I was mostly thinking of those people's works, not just their lives.
One of the sad aspects of literary history is the tendency of writers blessed with a good position in society, from Pushkin to Virginia Woolf, to sneer at the lowly scribblers who are unable to match their leisurely grace.
I couldn't agree more with the sentiment but I'm surprised by the examples. What about Pushkin's "???????? ????????????? ? ??????"? And doesn't Woolf see Shakespeare's hypothetical sister as tragically and unjustly denied the leisure to write?
Perfect Color Of Monster Beats Headphones.Monster beats headsets get very colorful and shining colors which will help uou get the most eye-catching if you find yourself walking in the lane. It has the perfect design in its appearance which can give you the active feeling and allow you to be to be the eye-catching person one of many crowd. Its perfect tone quality can also make you mad since the device can offer you just about the most wonderful experience if you find yourself listen to the beats. As all we are aware that, in today 's chaotic society, all people you live under a huge burden, so music are becoming a a growing number of popular way to relax people when they have a huge burden. So, how can people hear the really original music and new music? The answer is having a set good earphones. Monster Beats headphone is your best choice. It can deliver you original music which the artist create. It is Monster Beats ' make an effort to deliver all customers the most perfect music.Dr. Dre said people aren't hearing each of the music which composer along with producers work hard inside studio perfecting their tone. Usually, the comment earphone are unable to provide the most delightful tone quality sometimes can make us feel very angry. In the first position, the music should give us the right experience but for the bad headphones we loss the wonderful feeling when we are listen to the music. With Monster beats you can't have this annoyance much more, so you can like the wonderful moment.Monster beats headphones take music more detail and clear whenever you hope. what is your most unfortunate listening experienceMonster Beats probably will make you not have the knowledge any more. When you will be listening to the music within a noisy environment, you will angry that you just cannot listen clearly on the music, but if you wear Monster Beats you do not have this terrible experience. Monster Beats features extremely advanced materials and construction to give a new level associated with audio accuracy and readability. Combining extra-large speaker drivers and a high-power digital amplifier, Beats delivers an unprecedented mix of super deep bass, clean undistorted highs, and magnificent vocals never heard before from headphones. Made by having a scratch-resistant gloss finish, the foldable Beats headphones also give a compact connector to reduce bulk and an integrated mute button.In inclusion, you can experience just about the most comfortable feeling if you find yourself listening with Monster Beats headphones. You can never feel uncomfortable at the time you listen to the music for years because we use just about the most highly advanced materials. I can promise that you just cannot have the earache you will still hear the music with Monster for years.The style of the Monster Beats headphones is as well sale. Do you know the girl Gaga? I can believe everyone can say she's not a fashion lovely lady, and she likes the Monster Beats headphones a lot, so I think you can't ignore a person can be fashion if he has a set Monster Beats headphone. Monster Beats headphones supply you a opportunity as a fashion person.
Reminds me of how I had a lot of fun adding minor writers to the French Wikisource (gotten out of that lately, though). I wandered about pursuing works and writers alluded to in the texts I added or authors' biographies. It added a lot to my appreciation when I read Madame Bovary: I had read a bunch of sappy, pious early-nineteenth-century stuff, so I knew what Emma Bovary fed her mind on, I knew what Flaubert was reacting against, and I had a sense why his contemporaries were shocked.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.